- There should have only been one Star Wars movie.
- Doctor Who really is a children’s program.
- The fiscal impact of illegal file-sharing is probably insignificant, but it’s still a scummy thing to do.
- Internet petitions don’t work.
- Normal people don’t care what internet nerds think about anything.
- Your fan-fiction sucks.
- Wikipedia is pretty much useless for anything other than tv show and movie trivia.
- British television isn’t better than American television. They just know better than to run a show for more than thirteen episodes a year.
- Your blog is not important.
- Joss Whedon’s television shows are not feminist.
- Manga in America was just a fad.
- “Nerd” is not an honorific.
- Publishers, film producers, television networks, etc., are not trying to spite you.
- Comics are, if anything, probably too cheap.
- “Deconstruction” doesn’t mean what you think it does.
- Neither does “gravitas.”
- No one thinks your animated gif is funny.
- “Sexy vampires” have killed the horror genre.
- Film producers will stop making remakes when you stop going to see them.
- The so-called “casual” market for video-games is larger than the “hard-core” market. Deal with it.
- There is something creepy about grown men and women who collect toys.
- Saying “but I have gay friends” after you say something homophobic is a lie, and you know it.
|
29 Responses to “It Needed To Be Said”
|




Entries (RSS)
I agree with all except the Wikipedia one, expanding its scope out SLIGHTLY in that it’s quite useful for non-American readers. If there’s a fairly abstruse discussion of American politics, then Wikipedia is good as a basic primer as to who is who. It could be that you have a different perspective, in that things which are just naturally part of your cultural milieu — of COURSE people know why George McGovern hates George Meany, of COURSE people know about Notre Dame University, of COURSE people know why we care what G. Gordon Liddy thinks — aren’t natural to ‘the rest of us’.
Yep, pretty much.
About manga being a fad, I find that I’ve lost interest in the past year. I think it’s a combination of a a very busy year at work and an over-supply of schlock. The only series I’m still managing to read on a timely basis are XXXholic and Tsubasa Reservoir Chronicle, and they’re nearly done.
“Saying “but I have gay friends” after you say something homophobic is a lie, and you know it.”
Amen, brother.
And, may I add, “You super-cool screen name… isn’t.”
I usually enjoy your blog, but as a 45-year-old with a spare bedroom full of toys, the second-to-last entry on this list hurts. Can you please explain to me why I am creepy? And perhaps compare and contrast my level of creepiness to those grown-up men and women who engage in other childish interests, say superhero comics or “Doctor Who?” Oh wait, I’m into those too.
The moment I read the post title I got ready to find something to disagree with, but nope, nothing there.
BUT I HAVE GAY FRIENDS!
WITH GAY GRAVITAS!!
I WROTE ON MY BLOG: http://WWW.MISESTHEFUCKINGPOINT.ORG!!
I’ll get a petition to show you you’re wrong. Will five signatures do it?
>Publishers, film producers, television networks, etc., are not trying to spite you.
So true. You should do something on Get Off The Internet about Star Trek fans who keep asserting that J.J. Abrams filmed Scotty’s Engineering deck in a brewery as a deliberate fuck-you to the real fans.
Wikipedia is sometimes useful. Otherwise tough to argue the list.
President Obama is a centrist politician who will expend effort & money on big corporation but will most likely not repeal DADT, or explicitly endorse gay marriage or end the Iraq occupation shortly, or enact universal health care or if he does it will involve given a huge chunk of taxpayer money to private insurers.
Also the brewery was not the FU, “Klingon Warbirds” is.
Broader classification for the Joss Whedon entry: “Women Kicking Ass” is not inherently feminist.
The truth, Binkley, is that you look like a carrot.
You totally had me until you got to
“Comics are, if anything, probably too cheap. ”
Have to disagree. And even if I agree the conclusion that what needs to be done is to charge more for the product is a poor one. How about this, figure out ways to make them cheaper. I don’t need every single comic I be to be on glossy magazine style stock. Pulp would be perfectly okay (and would actually be appropriate to the quality of most comics out there).
The solution of fans walking into a comic store and being able to buy only 2 comics with a $10 bill isn’t a good one for anybody.
The industry is pushing out the next generation of comic fans, and possibly tomorrow’s brightest writers and artists, before they even pick up an issue. I can’t imagine that I would be the comic nerd I am today if I had to pay $4 for every issue when I was a kid. I know I wouldn’t have taken chances on smaller books or newer heroes, and would have a much smaller concept of the overall comic landscape.
british TV has the illusion of being good because you can cherry pick and not watch it according to our schedules. have you ever heard of two pints of lager and a packet of crisps? that’s a sitcom shown almost nonstop on the channel where they do torchwood and all the dr who special bonus stuff. it’s one of the worst things ever to happen on television ever (not that i’m big on dr who, but about 5 years ago BBC3 was showing 15 storeys high, one of the best things ever to happen on television).
there’s loads of american TV i love, but having to watch TV in america might make me want to die – am i right in thinking at least a third of airtime is commercials?
ok, i just looked and actually tonight there is double adam west batman on BBC4
sometimes they are good to us
Be fair, even Derrida didn’t know what Deconstruction meant.
#12 – Except the paper cost difference would be fairly negligible at that page count, and dropping the paper stock quality would reduce the already-low perceived value of periodical comics, so I don’t think publishers are in any rush to drop paper quality any time soon.
Most movie trilogies would have benefitted from just being one movie.
Wait — What does gravitas mean?
OK, but the one Star Wars movie should have been Empire, right? Or if you need to blow up a Death Star for an ending, the original with Boba Fett added in somewhere.
Nice list. I agree about comics probably being under priced. I went to a comic shop the other day for the first time in 20 years and I couldn’t believe how cheap they were. Then I went home and read through my purchases in 20 minutes [sigh], but still, everyone in the house read them after I did and we 5 range in age from almost 5 to 39. No other reading material in the house sees that kind of circulation. Finally, who reads a comic just once? They are an excellent value.
The only one I am going to say is “wrong” is this:
Film producers will stop making remakes when you stop going to see them.
Remaking older movies pretty much goes back to the very beginning of film making-along with adapting books/plays/comics. People complain like this is new…but it has always been the bread and butter, and even when it fails, it tends to be a safer bet than “new ideas”. And even if every person who complains about remakes stopped going? It would still be more profitable. The internet has made it seem as if lots of people hate remakes. But the fact is, the complainers are a very small subset of the movie going public-and just like “Normal people don’t care what internet nerds think about anything” the general public just doesn’t care.
(Personally, I think a large chunk of the “Remakes Suck” community thrives on remakes, because it is so easy to complain about)
Spot on for British television. I’m a huge fan, but we Americans so often forget that the Atlantic operates as a big ol’ crap filter. And even as good as it is at its best, we’ve got nothing to be ashamed of either, having produced Battlestar Galactica, The Wire, Deadwood, The Shield, and scores of other great shows.
As for Wikipedia, I think the more truthful statement would be: it may be a great source of information, but you only use it for entertainment trivia.
Mind you, the more important the subject, the more you should be compelled to follow their links to the sourced material, where you don’t have to worry about vandalized information.
A source of perpetual amusement for myself is the sheer number of people on comic boards hating on remakes and how often they use the phrase, “create something new”.
The same people who slavishly follow characters created before they were born and who are constantly (and I mean constantly) calling for another go at some beloved (and frequently canceled) book.
And I mean the exact same people, not the “same people” in that vague message board way that means “these people over here say thing and those people over there say that, so I’ll pretend it’s the same people saying these two contradictory things”. You’ll watch some poor loon go red in the face complaining about them remaking such-and-such film and how this demonstrates the complete lack of creativity in Hollywood, then his very next post two minutes later is in “WHAT CHARACTER SHOULD PETER DAVID WORK ON NEXT”, where he rattles off a laundry list of 78 beloved characters that he thinks Peter David would be a perfect fit for.
I do have gay friends, but I avoid gay jokes. I think the “gay friends” excuse only works when your gay friends are standing right next to you … and even then, only sometimes.
Of course, in the UK TV pundits bang on about how American TV is better because they can tell longer stories.
To further my point above:
Today’s XKCD jumps off from the Voynich manuscript, which I’d never heard of before. I checked Wikipedia and found a fairly good primer on the controversy, speculation as to its purpose, and so forth. It’s not going to make me into an expert, but it’s immensely easier than, say, Googling to find an alternate source.
(Not least because the top ten entries would be XKCD, Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors.)
“Of course, in the UK TV pundits bang on about how American TV is better because they can tell longer stories.”
This was something I found interesting when listening to the new audio commentaries on the Spaced DVDs. The American guests were praising British Television while putting down American Television…but the Spaced crew did the opposite-often sggesting Spaced is pretty much an ode to American television and movies that they love.
“‘Nerd’ is not an honorific.”
Speak for yourself, buster.
While I agree that comics should probably be worth more, of course with the extra money going to the writers and artists, it would create something of a problem for those of us not living in America. Here in New Zealand, I have to pay $10 for every comic I buy, and as a student on a low income, it does make things difficult.